December 23, 2016

Can Sri Lanka up their game in South Africa?

Sri Lanka have generally struggled to cope with the pace and seam of South Africa's pitches, but they have an opportunity to make a fresh beginning with a young team
41

Sri Lanka's top batsmen have all been well below par in Tests in South Africa © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

In 24 years since South Africa's readmission to international cricket, Sri Lanka have played exactly ten Tests there. During the same period, England have played 23, Australia 20 and India 17. The conditions in South Africa, with the bouncy and seamer-friendly pitches, are anyway difficult for Asian teams to adapt to, but the lack of frequent tours has further hurt teams like Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

Over the last two and a half decades, South Africa and Australia have been among the two toughest places to tour for Sri Lanka: in 20 Tests in those countries, Sri Lanka have lost 17, and won just one - in Durban in the 2011 Boxing Day Test. The two other big Asian teams have struggled in these countries too, but both India and Pakistan have had a few more wins. India have also played twice as many Tests as Sri Lanka in these two countries, which has obviously given their players a better chance to adapt. The difference between Sri Lanka's batting and bowling averages is almost 21, which indicates how hopelessly outmatched they have been in these Tests.

India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka in Australia and South Africa, since Jan 1990
Team Tests Won Lost Draw Ave Ave
 India  41  4  24  13  29.42  41.38
 Pakistan  28  3  22  3  23.76  38.43
 Sri Lanka  20  1  17  2  24.65  45.53

Sri Lanka have played only ten Tests in South Africa, the fewest among the top teams since 1992 © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

While Sri Lanka's overall record in South Africa isn't impressive, they are at least coming to the country with the knowledge that the last time they played a Boxing Day Test here, they won by a whopping 208 runs. That team included stalwarts like Kumar Sangakkara, Mahela Jayawardene and Tillakaratne Dilshan, but this younger team has players who are not burdened by the baggage of earlier defeats in South Africa. Also, while Sri Lanka have produced several terrific batsmen, most of those big names have struggled to make a mark in South Africa.

In 74 innings among them, Sangakkara, Jayawardene, Dilshan, Sanath Jayasuriya, Marvan Atapattu and Aravinda de Silva - Sri Lanka's six leading run-scorers in their Test history - have collectively scored a single Test century in South Africa, which was Sangakkara's 108 in the second innings of that famous Durban win. Collectively, they average 25.92 in these 74 innings, with nine half-centuries and eight ducks. In their collective Test careers, on the other hand, these six batsmen have scored 48,542 runs in 663 Tests, at an average of 46.23.

The Sri Lankan batsmen who have done better are the less celebrated ones - Thilan Samaraweera and Hashan Tillakaratne have, between them, scored three hundreds in 14 innings, and have a combined average of 49.17 in these 14 innings. Samaraweera, especially, was exceptional in the 2011-12 series, scoring two centuries in six innings.

Among Sri Lanka's top nine run scorers in Tests in South Africa, Samaraweera is the only batsman whose average in that country is better than his career average. For Sangakkara, Jayawardene and Jayasuriya, their averages in South Africa are more than 21 runs fewer than their career averages.

Sri Lanka's top nine run-scorers in South Africa, and their career numbers
Player Inns Runs Ave 100 Career ave Difference
 Sanath Jayasuriya  12  182  15.16  0  40.07  -24.91
 Mahela Jayawardene  16  446  27.87  0  49.84  -21.97
 Kumar Sangakkara  16  572  35.75  1  57.40  -21.65
 Tillakaratne Dilshan  10  202  22.44  0  40.98  -18.54
 Marvan Atapattu  14  307  21.92  0  39.02  -17.10
 Russel Arnold  10  149  14.90  0  28.01  -13.11
 Aravinda de Silva  6  183  30.50  0  42.97  -12.47
 Hashan Tillakaratne  8  251  35.85  1  42.87  -7.02
 Thilan Samaraweera  6  339  67.80  2  48.76  19.04

The current batting line-up of Kusal Mendis, Dhananjaya de Silva, Dimuth Karunaratne and Kaushal Silva will be up against a South African team buoyed by their spectacular series win in Australia, but they will also have an opportunity to break this template of Sri Lankan batsmen playing well below par in South Africa.

Similarly, Sri Lanka's bowling - especially their pace attack - has generally been pretty ineffective in the country, in conditions that should be ideal for quick bowling. Their two leading wicket-takers among seamers are Dilhara Fernando and Chaminda Vaas, and both have conceded more than 40 runs per wicket.

In fact, the Sri Lankan spinners have done far better than their seamer counterparts. Muttiah Muralitharan is their leading wicket-taker, with 35 wickets in six Tests at 26.02 - which is in sharp contrast to his stats in Australia - while Rangana Herath was the star of the Durban win in 2011, returning match figures of 9 for 128. Overall, the Sri Lankan seam average of 47.78 is poorer than all teams except Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, but their spin average of 29 is better than all teams except Australia.

Overseas teams' pace and spin stats in South Africa since 1992
Team Tests Pace - wkts Average Spin - wkts Average
 Australia  20  237  28.54  98  27.57
 Bangladesh  4  14  82.57  13  52.15
 England  23  257  33.70  60  43.86
 India  17  166  36.20  81  37.96
 New Zealand  15  148  34.34  32  46.65
 Pakistan  12  107  36.18  55  32.41
 Sri Lanka  10  65  47.78  58  29.00
 West Indies  15  143  44.64  31  67.03
 Zimbabwe  3  13  74.53  7  36.42

Top wicket-takers in Tests for Sri Lanka in South Africa
Player Mat Wickets Average Econ rate
 Muttiah Muralitharan  6  35  26.02  2.57
 Dilhara Fernando  7  18  43.27  4.07
 Chaminda Vaas  5  11  47.45  3.21
 Rangana Herath  3  10  27.70  2.39

Sri Lanka's fast bowlers have a history of underperforming in conditions that traditionally favour seam and swing - their numbers in England, Australia and South Africa back this up - but none of the specialist fast bowlers in their current squad have played a Test in South Africa.

For the bowlers and for the batsmen, this series is an opportunity to put behind the history of underperformance and prove that Sri Lanka can compete with the best even with a young team and in unfamiliar conditions.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Sajith on December 25, 2016, 16:54 GMT

    Nope Sri Lanka do not stand a chance. But that's what they said before series against Aussies. Sri Lankan team is the most unpredictable team in world cricket for very long time, in fact almost for 3 decades. They never play up to expectations, when they expected to lose they win, when they expected to win they lose, when they are against the wall they push all the way back. So should they change that however they can? become the dominating side in world cricket? win almost everything? Actually they cant. Even if they can, Dude, where is the fun in that.

  • Oshan on December 25, 2016, 8:54 GMT

    good time to change the stats positively with this tour, wwwww after long time,they can play test cricket with full of confident than other formats,

  • udendra on December 25, 2016, 6:10 GMT

    Samaraweera was an unsung battin hero of Sri Lankan cricket.

  • Adahas Ada on December 25, 2016, 4:16 GMT

    #3nil #Australia #DontRuleUsOut

  • nethun6224372 on December 24, 2016, 21:46 GMT

    @jaygadson-Hilarious,like any other team wouldn`t struggle in SA. These guys just beat Oz at their home so it`s not like us,bd and zim are the only teams that would struggle here

  • kuldeep on December 24, 2016, 17:10 GMT

    @ VENKATESH VENKATESH. you have forgotten Shrilankas Greatest win In Eng in 2014.Mathews is The Hero as your time span2013-14-15.

  • Ranil on December 24, 2016, 15:14 GMT

    @john_bnsa, critical analysis!

  • Satish on December 24, 2016, 14:29 GMT

    Very clear that SL are in for a thrashing of a lifetime that they will remember for a very long time!

  •   Venkatesh Venkatesh on December 24, 2016, 11:30 GMT

    All the Sub continent test teams are really home condition tigers there is no second thoughts about but when they play out side sub continent they find it is rather difficult to adjust pace & bounce especially in Australia and South Africa whereas in England and New Zealand it is seam because of heavy atmosphere & now any team can beat WI anywhere and test will be over at the maximum in three days , the main draw back of sub continent teams lack of experience to adjust pace ,bounce and most of them are venerable out side the off stump if thy overcome these problems they can give fight but most of the time they lack it except Indian team which gave some real scares to Australia in Adelaide & Perth in 2014-15 series and played well in SA and NZ summer in 2013 on that both occasions Kohili was the hero and how Pakistan and SriLanka fared in bouncy track the history will tell us and less said better about BD .All said and done SA has lot of advantage against Sri Lanka

  • Jay Gadsdon on December 24, 2016, 9:55 GMT

    Oh i didnt realise its a test series, nope not a chance, please note this is the very reason why 2 tier test cricket was nearly introduced, with sanga mahela murali they were a top division side.

  • No featured comments at the moment.