February 10, 2017

What do Warner and du Plessis have in common?

Their ODI careers have been remarkably similar so far, and over the last couple of years both have reached new highs in the format
16

Both David Warner and Faf du Plessis didn't have great starts to their ODI careers, but have been in irresistible form recently © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

At first glance, there aren't too many similarities between Faf du Plessis and David Warner. One made his mark in international cricket for playing one of the most dogged defensive innings seen in recent years, while the other barely has a defensive bone in his body. Du Plessis' fourth-innings 110 not out in Adelaide, spanning 466 minutes and 376 balls, was a flawless exhibition of old-fashioned batting to save a game, while one of Warner's early batting masterclasses was a blistering 159-ball 180 against India in Perth. In Tests, Warner is clearly ahead: he has played 60 Tests to du Plessis' 37, has scored more than twice as many runs as du Plessis, and has an 18-6 lead in terms of Test hundreds.

In ODIs, though, their numbers are remarkably similar historically and also recently: both have been in the news in the last few days for notching up huge scores in the 50-over format. Warner plundered 179 off 128 balls against a hapless Pakistan attack in Adelaide on January 26, and less than two weeks later, du Plessis topped him by six runs in Cape Town, taking the Sri Lankan bowlers apart in a 141-ball 185. These are the two highest individual scores in ODIs in nearly two years.

In his first 45 one-day innings, du Plessis made zero hundreds. In his next 52 he made eight © AFP

Both batsmen have been in scintillating ODI form for a while now, but the early years in the format were a struggle for both, which is especially surprising for Warner, given the way he usually bats. Till the end of 2013, both du Plessis and Warner had batted around 40 times in ODIs, and both had averages below 30; Warner had two hundreds from 38 innings, and du Plessis had none from 45. Since then, both have more or less doubled their averages, and the hundreds have flowed as well - eight from 52 innings for du Plessis, and 11 from 53 for Warner.

Warner and du Plessis in ODIs
  David Warner Faf du Plessis
Period Inngs Runs Ave SR inngs Runs Ave SR
Till Dec 2013 38 1133 29.81 80.58 45 1102 27.55 83.54
Jan 2014 onwards 53 2813 56.26 105.43 52 2621 58.24 90.25
Career 91 3946 44.84 96.85 97 3723 43.80 88.16

In the last three years, du Plessis' average of 58.24 is second only to AB de Villiers' 69.40, among the 24 batsmen who have scored 1500-plus ODI runs during this period. His strike rate has been pretty nifty too, at 90.25. During this period he has passed fifty 25 times in 52 innings, which is an excellent conversion rate of once every two innings; before 2014, he had seven in 45, an average of one every 6.4 innings. His consistency has also been exemplary against all opposition teams: he averages more than 40 versus all teams against whom he has batted more than once during this period, and more than 50 against seven out of nine teams.

Warner's numbers during this period are similarly impressive, though he did struggle against Sri Lanka on the 2016 tour.

Top averages for batsmen in ODIs since Jan 2014 (Min 1500 runs)
Player Inns Runs Ave SR 100s 50s
 AB de Villiers  48  2568  69.40  118.77  8  14
 Faf du Plessis  52  2621  58.24  90.25  8  17
 Kumar Sangakkara  41  2118  57.24  93.30  9  10
 Virat Kohli  53  2601  56.54  94.82  10  11
 Ross Taylor  47  2031  56.41  83.64  8  8
 David Warner  53  2813  56.26  105.43  11  10
 Rohit Sharma  39  1957  54.36  95.04  6  9
 Kane Williamson  58  2906  53.81  86.84  5  21
 Steven Smith  59  2721  51.33  87.85  8  16

Du Plessis' numbers prove that he clearly belongs among the elite group of ODI batsmen today. Many of them occupy the No. 3, as is obvious from the table below, but while all the others are high-profile names, du Plessis has seldom received the accolades that the others have. Admittedly, the others have all excelled in Tests as well, while du Plessis' Test form was patchy between 2013 and 2015 - he averaged 35.36 during this period, and had an especially wretched 2015. However, since taking over Test captaincy, his stats have improved significantly in that format as well: in his last eight Tests he averages 54.60, with two hundreds. He needs to maintain his Test form over a longer period, but in ODIs he clearly belongs in the top bracket, along with the likes of Warner, Virat Kohli, Kane Williamson and Joe Root.

Most ODI runs by No. 3 batsmen since Jan 2014
Player Inns Runs Ave SR 100s
 Kane Williamson  58  2906  53.81  86.84  5
 Faf du Plessis  48  2453  57.04  88.90  8
 Steven Smith  44  2206  55.15  85.40  7
 Virat Kohli  41  2169  60.25  95.55  9
 Kumar Sangakkara  41  2118  57.24  93.30  9
 Joe Root  27  1352  54.08  91.97  4

Warner's recent highs in ODIs have been even higher than du Plessis'. In his last 15 innings, his scores have read as follows: 106, 48, 40, 50, 117, 6, 173, 24, 119, 156, 7, 16, 35, 130, 179 - a grand total of 1206 runs at an average of 80.40 and a strike rate of 110.33, with seven hundreds and a fifty. No batsman has ever scored more runs in a 15-innings stretch - the next best is Sachin Tendulkar's 1105 between April and October 1998. In fact, the aggregates for the others in the top five are within 25 runs of each other, while Warner is 101 runs clear of Tendulkar's aggregate, which illustrates the sort of dominant run he has had in ODIs recently.

Warner's seven hundreds is also the best by any batsman over a 15-innings period; before his current run, no other batsman had scored more than six.

No batsman has scored as many ODI runs in 15 successive innings as David Warner © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

In his last 12 innings, Warner has scored 1012 runs, which is the fewest successive innings in which a batsman has scored 1000-plus runs in ODIs: Tendulkar and Kohli had both achieved this in 13 innings.

Least consecutive innings to 1000 runs in ODIs
Batsman Period Inngs Runs Ave SR 100s
  David Warner  2016-17  12  1012  84.33  112.31  6
  Virat Kohli  2015-17  13  1006  91.45  101.61  5
  Sachin Tendulkar  1998  13  1013  92.09  99.21  5

And here are more Warner hot streaks: he has scored two hundreds in each of his last three ODI series - against South Africa, New Zealand and Pakistan. No other player in ODI history has achieved this, though a few - including Kohli and Amla - have achieved this in two series.

Also, Warner has three 150-plus scores in his last nine innings, which is easily the fewest innings in which a batsman has notched up three such scores. He has almost halved the previous record: Tendulkar achieved this in 17 innings in 2009-10, while Rohit Sharma managed it in 20 innings between November 2014 and January 2016.

Least consecutive innings to make three 150+ scores in ODIs
Batsman Innings Period
  David Warner  9  2016-17
  Sachin Tendulkar  17  2009-10
  Rohit Sharma  20  2014-16
  Hashim Amla  52  2012-15

Both Warner and du Plessis have been in the ODI form of their lives over the last couple of years. The challenge for them will be to keep this going at least till the conclusion of the Champions Trophy later this year.

With inputs from Shiva Jayaraman.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. @rajeshstats

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Talib_BD_FAN on February 11, 2017, 5:59 GMT

    I think bd selectors and public have faith in Soummay Sarker like the Ausie had in Warner.

  • SLMaster on February 10, 2017, 20:42 GMT

    Amazing Sanga still in the list after retirement after 2014.

  • prijha on February 10, 2017, 18:00 GMT

    Faf is a good man, Warner isn't. I cheer for good men.

  •   Raghu Panjala on February 10, 2017, 16:45 GMT

    Cant believe there are so many good batsmen in SA --- De Vill,Faf, Amla,Kock while Ind has only 2 Kohli,Rsharma, Aus 2--SSmith,warner. When it comes to test, Ind- Pujara,rahane,vijay,Kohli . Same team as above added with Duminy makes SA strongest team. if we consider Ind's bowling, we come low of other teams esp in away matches.

  • gagan203 on February 10, 2017, 13:47 GMT

    @cric123 : Mate ABD is in different league altogether.. Kohli is on 2nd no. you can check stats again batting at 3 in article.

  • DrJez on February 10, 2017, 13:33 GMT

    Some nice analysis here. But one can't look at ODI batting purely in terms of averages, and relegate strike rate to a footnote. Whereas Warner has scored at 105 over the last 3 years, DuPlessis is only at 90. You might say that 90 is good, but over the course of 50 overs that equates to a team score of 270, which is not so great nowadays.

  • HadesLogic on February 10, 2017, 12:20 GMT

    @CRICI123, "but just goes to show that Kohli isn't that great", really? Only the numbers here from last 3 years are your benchmark for tagging him like that or does it involve some thought too? Let me give you some more numbers to digest then, comparing him to SPD, ABD, Faf and Warner. Over their careers, no one has a lower match / century ratio (6.6), only ABD has played more innings (30), only ABD has a comparable average, only ABD and Warner have a better SR (100, 96 vs 91), only ABD has more MoM (3 in 30 more), and only Warner has a better match / MoM in almost half the matches (7.8 vs 8.1). Clearly ABD and Virat are FAR ahead of the pack and everyone else is 2nd tier, sure Warner has covered a lot of ground in the last 2 years but he has not even played a 100 matches. Good performance over the last 2-3 years is a measure of FORM not GREATNESS. You have to look at one's career for that.

  • 5Worldcup's in 5Continent's on February 10, 2017, 12:11 GMT

    @ FAF_CaptianOfTheWorld.., Gotta be kidding. Faf is a tamper and not Dave.

  • crici123 on February 10, 2017, 10:58 GMT

    Well @Gagan.... If you look at all the stats on this page, either Faf or Warner has done better than Kohli, not to mention AB's sick average since 2014. I know this article and criteria is not, at all, relevant to overall batting ability in all formats, but just goes to show that Kohli isn't that great.

  • Juanbundyholio on February 10, 2017, 10:41 GMT

    @FAF_CAPTIANOFTHEWORLD Warner is a 'slogger' I'd be happy to have in my team - and I'm South African!! He's an outstanding batsman who trusts his technique, which - counterintuitively - has to be sounder than a blocker, in many respects. Before you have a pop at me, Faf is one of my favourite players of the last few years and he shows what it means to play for SA by sticking it out when many would have headed overseas.

  • No featured comments at the moment.